Caulonia 2000

   
ItalianIndex pageHome page

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Top

 


              More on the rebellion of Caulonia: "my rebels"
by Nicola Frammartino

In 1975 when Ilario Ammendolia and I, almost feverishly wrote a short book which we sent off to print as “Repubblica Rossa di Caulonia” (The red republic of Caulonia), we had not intended it to be a historical reference, as we were not historians then and are still not historians today.
The text was simply a commemoration of the events which had taken place thirty years earlier and which we looked upon with benevolence and affection.
Within those pages was the effort to leave the young a picture worked in light strokes portraying the lives of the farmers and the artisans of Caulonia and its countryside as they were before the revolution. We did not presume to write learned social analysis, nor were we concerned with maintaining scientific objectivity. We wrote for the sole joy of talking about a civilisation, that of the farmers, which was on the brink of disappearing,

and of which we wanted to leave some trace; one could observe a fair amount of naivety here because the traces would have remained even without our small contribution.
We were very young, and literally fascinated, almost dazzled by that world full of intense humanity. That world had the effect on us of a great myth which completely swept us away.
Whoever remembers the years in which we wrote the book, the seventies, will understand, thanks to direct experience or through personal documentation.
In Caulonia back then, there was a tumultuous explosion of initiative and ideas; souls were alight with the hope of deep and radical change which was believed to be just round the corner; everyone wanted to bring at least one brick for the construction of the new world which we were dreaming of.
It was in that climate of great moral, cultural and political tension that we felt the overpowering need to rediscover or reread the events of thirty years before which had been completely forgotten after being depicted in the most obscure colours for decades, as though they were a shameful part of our history, something which it was better not to speak of. The cultural climate of Caulonia, and not only, has changed yet again and, as a consequence, a revision of the facts in the old way is gaining popularity. As I write this remark, so as not to create confusion, I would like to express my greatest respect towards those who wrote “in the old style” making a concerted effort regarding their argumentation and documentation.
The rebels of Caulonia who, on the morning of the 5th of March 1945 left their lairs at dawn, who crept down the steep mountainside under the first rays of the rising sun, were fired with great ideals of justice and liberation.
And that, for me, is enough.

Today the hero farmers are no longer among us because the industrial and post-industrial civilisations have defeated them, destroying them, but they have left us a sublime message: to die most worthily while fighting strenuously to defend the values of their civilisation.
Centuries of hard work and sacrifice had taught them to see beyond what others, blinded by their knowledge, had not been able to understand: the rapacious and arrogant dominant classes, remnants of the old landowners, were dying and by now in agony. In fact, within very little time from then the old landowners disappeared entirely from the historical scene. This was what the rebels of Caulonia had seen in 1945 when they tried to take up the flag of justice for the farmers of the south. It was, however, a dream, the illusion of a moment, because other more wealthy social classes, who were not then ready yet, would subsequently take control of the whole society.
The heroes of Caulonia descended into the old feudal town and took control of it. The old managerial classes were left so numb at the sight of such audacity that they either handed themselves over to the rebels or they fled.
On the other hand, there were those who behaved with dignity and composure.
However it is never a question of single persons: the old ruling class, worn-out and undone within, had lost any form of moral and cultural supremacy: it merely exercised its tyrannical power over the whole society.


It was precisely because of the lack of initiative and outlets for their ambitions that the ruling class had closed itself in becoming more and more mean and evil. Those notable members who fled before the impetus of the “cafoni” (farmers) of Caulonia and the nearby farmhouses, returned, following the steps of an ancient and well experimented borbonist tradition, as soon as the police’ s bayonets appeared. Against the farmers of Caulonia, poorly armed and badly organised, the animal fury of hundreds and hundreds of well armed, well trained, equipped and above all, ferociously instigated and bravely led, strategically placed men crashed down, sent through the small lanes of ancient Caulonia by the wealthy class members who, in the meantime, had returned. In short, it was they who decided and wrote the lists of dangerous and innocent people.
If ever there was a page of our history worthy of shame, this is the one: the cold-blooded, unpitying massacre of the farmer heroes who had not had the heart or the means to let the blood flow.
If innocent blood was spilled during the days of the rebellion it was not a cold decision calculated by the rebels who had they let themselves be guided by vengeance would have shed a very different kind of blood than that of an innocent priest.

The Caulonian rebels first endured violence and then prison: hundreds of years of imprisonment were inflicted upon them; but they left prison with an untamed will to fight and became the protagonists of the great struggle for bread, work and land which fired Caulonia in the following years.
The broadness of the leadership spectrum and the strongly rooted democratic values within our country are conquests which owe thanks partly to the sacrifice of those who fought in 1945.
Having said this, one asks oneself how much value can be attributed to the arguments which treat the rebels as though they were violent, members of the mafia and above all, ignorant idiots.
Nowadays there are many people who believe they can take any liberties they please on the strength of a few more books they have read than the others, therefore so as not to run the risk of any written or verbal aggression, I keep my thoughts to myself in the hope that one day it will be possible to discuss the subject with a little more style, even only among ourselves.

Among the rebels, and this is an undeniable fact, there was a strong will for redemption and liberation during the beginning of the 1900s.
No intellectual and no political force had ever cared to confront the problem of the working class’ misery, nor their wish for redemption and liberation.
But this slice of population needed a guide.
And in Caulonia there was a man, he was cultured, audacious, courageous, obstinate and above all he was blessed with a rebellious and anti-state spirit.

The meeting of minds between him and the “cafoni” was inevitable.


Pasquale Cavallaro, his son Ercole and Guido Verdiglione
Source: Caulonia, dal Fascismo alla “Repubblica” (Caulonia, from Fascism to the “Republic”)
By Orazio Raffaele Di Landro


From this meeting “quel movimento” (that movement) was born.
It is not my intention to don the robes of the expert in order to pass a historiographical judgement on the subject of the rebellion, on its limits, on the possibilities of its development, on the role of its head figure, (positive or negative that he had been), or on the weight brought about by the “’ndrangheta” and whether it contaminated the revolt or whether it must be considered an expression of the will for autonomy on behalf of the peasants in the face of the tyranny of the nobility who headed a power system based on unspeakable cruelty and violence.

I have no difficulty in recognising that the movement was not the expression of one class which, for a host of reasons, could stand as a candidate to govern a State.

What I am unable to understand is the pretension to judge the Caulonian revolt on the basis of the life, the juridical events and anything personal to do with the life of Pasquale Cavallaro. If this were the right procedure, the entire history of humanity would have to be rewritten. It would mean that the historians should ask themselves what the criminal records of the people who assaulted the Bastille in 1789, triggering the French Revolution, were like. Or what the criminal records of those who assaulted the Winter Palace were like, or even what those of the followers of Mao on the long march were like.
Otherwise they should investigate the very adventurous life of Garibaldi in South America before he became the hero of the two worlds and so on.
What interests us foremost is the movement and then the figure of Cavallaro in relation to the movement.
Neither what came before nor what Cavallaro became afterwards can change the substance of the verdict on the revolt.

I know that today my rebels of 1945 are no longer here. From then until today many other things have happened. They were defeated like the Trojan heroes who saw their houses burned down as they were dispersed throughout the world, losing their cultural identity and even their pride in having been the protagonists of a glorious fact.
Today generosity and human solidarity are no longer what they used to be. Today, more numerous and perhaps even stronger are those who carry forth political struggle for other reasons and with other intentions.

I believe this to be reason enough to immortalise the glorious actions of the 1945 heroes of Caulonia.

 
   


 

More on the rebellion of Caulonia: "my rebels"
by Nicola Frammartino
Il Corriere di Caulonia - August 1988



Top


 


Copyright© 2000 Caulonia 2000 per continuare a cambiare - All rights reserved